mission | archive | zine | manifestos | weblog | contact

 

12.08.00, 10:54 p.m. || i feel like an unnatural woman

What's going on in the "I'm used to be a geek, but now I'm chic" themed-talk shows?

I'm thinking of the many films since Audrey Hepburn's My Fair Lady that portray similar transformations -- apparently unsophisticated, bespectacled, "ugly" women somehow "blossoming" (isn't that the word always used?) into stunning beauties by the merest hint of heterosexual romance. Ally Sheedy's character in The Breakfast Club was much more attractive and intriguing as the raccoon-eyed kleptomaniac, pre-crush by the bland jock Emilio Estevez and pre-makeover by teen queen Molly Ringwald. Does anyone really buy Sandra Bullock as a "masculine" FBI agent whose undercover gig as a beauty contestant finally excavates her as a "real woman" in the new Miss Congeniality? Didn't anyone notice that Rachel Cook in She's All That couldn't possibly hide her fine bone structure beneath even unreasonably thick black glasses? 

Are the talk shows centered about the "geek to chic" about reproducing this dynamic, of reeling in the inappropriately gendered teens (too much tomboy, too much nerd) with unruly bodies (too tall, too fat, too flat) and "proving" that even they can be redeemed by a normative sex/gender/desire matrix? Is this supposed to be hopeful? 

Here's another question -- why do heterosexuals bickering in films and television always turn to romance by the end? Does every Meg Ryan film center on this tired plot device?