mission
| archive | zine | manifestos | weblog | links | contact
March
1, 2001, 9:39 a.m. || update
I just wanted to cop out again with
two new Punk Planet columns up. The first is a collaborative project
with Dwayne Dixon, project coordinator for the Literacy Through
Photography program at Duke University, about the photography of
violence -- of lynching, of war, of the disappeared. The
second was "inspired" by the Alcatraz trip Mark
and I took in December, and the politics of prison tourism
.
February 27,
2001, 9:00 a.m. || the evidence is
everywhere
Hi Mimi--
The latest New Yorker has a multi-page color ad
section about travel... here are some quotes:
"Authenticity can be elusive in a world inundated with
American pop culture"
"Basically, what you've seen in the last ten years is a
movement away from collecting places, and a movement toward collecting
cultures"
"Religious festivals permit intimate access to a
culture"
"You'd be amazed how far a few dollars goes in South
Africa... for information call toll-free 1-877 Mandela"
Honest, I'm not making any of this up. (And I haven't even
attempted to describe the visual images.) This reminds me of the time I
listened to an ad agency employee recount how the images in a TV
commercial had been chosen, focus-grouped, and fine-tuned-- the level of
semiotic analysis would have put Barthes to shame. They're way ahead of
us, I fear...bell hooks is writing about "eating the Other" but these
motherfuckers are printing the goddamn menu.
Anyway if you're interested I can snail mail the New
Yorker pages to you. I can also include at no extra charge a box of
Dramamine to help you control the inevitable waves of nausea.
--affectionately, jvb
8:20 a.m. || so
many bad journalists
Seriously, aren't you supposed to contact me if you're going to quote me at length in an article about queer blogs? (And this isn't even a blog.)
It's not that I mind being called a "brainy woman with too much theory on her
tongue for her own good," but are you really so naïve to believe that this
journal site represents my reality? That the imagined transparency of the
digital interaction renders myself also obvious? This isn't a
What I Did Today site. This isn't a This Is The Real Me site. This is
occasionally a Trials and Tribulations of Being a GSI (Graduate Student Instructor)
site, a Writing as a Critical Project site. And sometimes it's just a
Pain in the Ass.
Journal sites are crafted, deliberate mediations that are
sometimes achingly self-aware while pretending to "honesty." I
don't pretend to be "honest," which too often translates
into "pointless confessional." I don't use this space for therapy
or personal revelation. I'll avoid the Foucault and just say
that this is a prosthetic me, one that isn't necessarily
self-identical. All my parts are not laid out here. Isn't that just
common sense?
PUNK POINTS: Aaron Cometbus scolded me for not doing wider
distribution for my zine. (I shrugged and forever branded myself a bad
zinester in his eyes, I'm sure.)