mission | archive | word | weblog | links | contact

January 26, 2002, 1:32 a.m.

The sentimentalizing work of kitsche (crying eagle decals and endless tribute albums); the limits of queer theory and the conceptual mobility (and not) of drag; the privileged subject of US minority discourse; moral panics about "infection" (viral, symbolic or otherwise) and moral claims mobilized by"identity;" the resilience of race not as an imagined "essence" but a fluid agent of control; therapeutic discourses of refugee trauma; coffee table photographs of "migrations" and "refugees;" Nixon's "plumbers," conspiracy theories and executive "suicide;" that unwieldy thing that is an academic career; the centerfold photograph of the (white) "gay heros" of 9-11 in a national gay magazine -- a New York City fireman and male police officer press chaste lipflesh under a clear blue Manhattan skyline -- and the figure of the queer patriot who desires citizenship in the national imaginary.

(Here I will I confess, I have no such desire.)  

I am restless, distracted, overwhelmed. Where do I begin? I sit down to write but the cat (with no prompting from me) drapes himself over the keyboard and stares at me unblinkingly with beseeching cat eyes. Rachel calls from 3,000 miles away and we discuss for hours her qualifying exams, my dissertation woes, Judith Butler's The Psychic Life of Power, her street medic training and all the ladies we know who are in "progressive" porn films (including the now-famous Bend Over Boyfriend). Mark and I recap the daily news over dinner with much rolling of the eyes and slumping despair, and discuss what a responsible photojournalist practice might look like (in the mental notes I make, I checkmark Roland Barthes and Rey Chow for the next time). I pray fervently that Tara isn't the one marked for death in this season of Buffy, wonder how The X-Files series finale will manage to tie up all the many loose and dangling ends, and note that the appearance of mysterious infants (Angel, X-Files) is always a bad, bad sign.

January 17, 2002, 4:59 p.m.

Someone shoot me now -- my computer just ate half my dissertation chapter and replaced it with lots and lots of squares and assorted symbols. I think I'll go crawl under the covers now and ponder my future in retail.

January 16, 2002, 10:34 a.m.

listening: our collection of 80s seven-inches

I have been reading about the development of the x-ray and the lab technicians at the turn of the century, exposing their arms to radiation to measure its effects, even as the cancer grows, the lesions develop, the functions deteriorate, and important things like fingers drop off like brittle candy. The economy of suffering apparently has scientific value as well. And I'm thinking too about the eroticism once attached to the x-ray --thinking of those demonstrative film clips of a skeletal figure opening a compact and applying lipstick to the vague outlines of flesh over bone-- and how this machine that exposes intimate internal workings was denounced as an immoral invention, a nightmare of seduction and destruction.